A Brief Analysis Circa Jan 2024
My views are not accessible to most people. Before the analysis I am going to outline my views in bullet points to make my perspectives and biases more clear.
1. Human beings post-hoc (after the fact) rationalize the world starting from their political theology and working backward to physical reality and direct experience.
2. The genesis of political theologies is mostly biological in origin, based on race, class (as a mostly biology grouping within race) and inherent ability/status (beautiful, competent, ugly, incompetent).
3. Elites, vanguards and mafias are the structures that define effective political action. There is no other relevant kind of group that is a genesis for political action.
4. Popular will as a justification and origin of political action is no more real and no more illusory than saying a policy is justified because god wills it. They are both theologies divorced from the mechanics of political power.
AI:
Techno-feudalism is likely to be an inevitable outcome. The only lack of clarity is if it will be the globalist plantation form, or the techno-accelerationist, space colonization form. A mix of the two is likely, with elite vanguards of both that both compete and cooperate at different times and places.
I don’t believe the proponents of the old plantation form of globalism have hegemonic control of neural net AI technology. I know most conspiracy inclined people tend to believe they had it sitting in a bunker somewhere till they were ready to release it. I don’t believe that is true of this particular technology, though I think it is likely true for other technologies that presented problems for their plans, such as cheap energy technologies.
AI is unlikely to be restrained because:
a. There are too many competing players that are afraid of being left behind.
b. The runway is clear for exponential development. The neural net architecture is accessible to anyone with an industrial level of computational power at their disposal. This computation is beyond individuals currently, but most large state actors are developing programs currently, including the Arab states, China, etc. The centre of the developments is likely to remain OpenAI and the USA. they seem to be furthest ahead and I suspect this lead will be maintained or widened over time as AI is used to enhance and design future AI.
I suspect the transformation human life will be both rapid and in many ways imperceptible because old aspects of life with simple fade away. Much as life has changed, seamlessly incorporating the internet and smartphones over the last 20 years leaving huge gaps based on collective choices, rather than prohibitions. Similarly the transition to drone and humanoid robotics will be accelerated by the same processes. The combustion engine first revolutionized mechanized warfare, then became an oddity of commercial life, then a convenience, then a necessity for everyday life. Robotics will proceed in a similar fashion, though I believe much more rapidly, particularly in the consumer demand for functional humanoid robots.The aging population and decline in the young will necessitate this pathway of development.
Jewish Power:
Jews are highly integrated on all politically relevant sides of the culture war. Their tendencies for:
A. Radical ingroup preference, and
B. Cosmopolitan demolition of cultural integrity,
Will continue apace. In many way they are the most effective tool for globalist middle management control. In others ways they are their own enemies because their deconstructionist impulses turn against their own consolidated group interests.
Anglo Elite Power/ European Black Nobility:
This is a topic rarely discussed except in the more schizophrenic circles, but is significantly true. Globalism is an alliance between European old aristocracy and Jewish banking families.
Ethnocentric and ethno-nationalist aims focused on white solidarity never effectively deal with the fact that high-class white people hate low class white people more than they dislike other races. The ultimate expression of this being the unity of Jewish banking families and old European aristocracy who view the rest of humanity as plantation animals, including the members of their own race.
Feminization of Society:
Male vs Female interest are not and have never been aligned or compatible. Both male and female individual interests have to be suppressed to make civilization work, but women’s much more than men’s. No one gets this correct. Conservatives believe that marriage and previously relevant social forms can be culturally restored without oppressive external restrictions on technology, wealth and personal behavior. This is incorrect. Manosphere or redpill commentators want to abandon civilizational aims altogether for individual pleasure. Though the red pill aims are individually rational, they are socially destructive. Rightwing commentators are diverse in their views but tend toward a belief that individual machismo and being a chud caricature will solve the structural problems, or that the structural problems don’t matter because they believe weak men lose and should lose. All of these views fail to deal with the technological and economic causation of birth decline and feminization in society.
Women’s on-average desires are an evolutionary mismatch to modern circumstances because they can get their historically defined rewards (safety, comfort, attention) without providing children. The emotional nature of female reasoning also means that appeals to numbers and mathematics will be meaningless. They will, as a group, literally let the species die rather than do something that doesn’t feel nice. I don’t say that out of spite, it’s just true.
Much of what can be described as wrong with current society and culture can be described as its feminization. Conflicts are resolved through deceit and meangirls whisper campaigns of reputation destruction rather than open conflict in arms, or even in courts. This also comports with the Jewish tendencies to resolve conflict through deception, control of language, whisper campaigns and gaslighting.
It’s unlikely that these tendencies can be reversed in an ever increasingly information dense environment where rumors and insinuations are simply more efficient and practical than physical weaopns. The incentives to use that power are too strong. The answer to this may be the increasing feudalization or insularization of corporations run by powerful individuals that still require competency and functional work environments.
Wokeness is Doomed, But the Conflict Will Never End:
Herbert Marcuse, one of the fathers of the Frankfurt School, Critical Theory (and its children in Critical Race and Critical Gender Theory), saying that to complete the socialist revolutionary arc of history it would be necessary to recruit subaltern identities. The working class had been made comfortable by cheap consumer goods and services and needed to be replaced by a new engine of revolutionary zeal. Subaltern identities are outcasts and "marginalized groups" in society. Because they can't ever be integrated with a normal historical version of human life, he viewed them as the groups that would be necessary to complete the revolutionary reeducation of the rest society into a post-Marxist, cultural-Marxist utopia.
The epitome of Marcus’ model can be seen in the events at Evergreen State College. This will be a continuing element of life, but probably not one that can be used to take over the whole of Western civilization, at least more than it has already.
Belief in Self Goodness:
Empathy (as a manifestation of the desire for social approval and conformity with political theology) is stronger than self preservation. People will die for what they believe. There is no wake up moment. When people become embarrassed or lose status, they will start to hide what they really believe, rather than really change.
Conservative Leadership is a Blackhole of Incompetence: There is no relevant reactionary vanguard pushing back. Conservatives are the heirs of a fantasy version of MLK’s political theology. The current crop of “conservative” elites, the Trumps and Carlsons, are wildly incompetent and morally empty. They are likely to win in the medium term, but will fuck things up even worse long term. All sides are aligned to one facet of Jewish power or another. I don’t mean that as monolithic condemnation. I mean it as a matter of fact and recognition. They are unable to address structural problems created by that group because their power base is significantly composed of those same people.
Understanding of the anti-white agenda is becoming commonplace at ground level. This will continue, but it will not change circumstances at the elite level of society. The elite reactions will vary, but be restricted to wokism on one side and professing a return to color blind ethics on the other. This may change in one generation more distance from the political theology generated after WWII.
Superficial political resistance to anti-white hatred will continue be made use of by the conservative elites-in-waiting. In reality they have no actually attachment to race or group purpose. They are, to the last man, interested in money and power at the individual level. They are simply positioning themselves to take advantage of a narrative to capture money and attention for their own elevation. If they ever enter power it will be time to bury the hatchet in support of them ruling the multi-ethnic Western empire that is now theirs to profit from.
Russia equally represents a multi-ethnic empire with opposed interests to the West. Superficial and momentary pledges to family values aside, Russia simply has a different means of enforcing their empirical interests that doesn’t involve pride flags.
I remain Atlanticist, anti-third world and anti-Duganist in my own thoughts and positions, despite the near-total moral and intellectual vacuum of Western leadership.
The Way Forward is Unclear.
Demographic submersion of whites and other high civilization races, IQ decline, Marcusian bioleninist apparatchiks, Jewish power, Globalism, all remain deep problems. Few solutions exist presently. Likely reactions will be:
Byzantiums: Corporations, city states or small states run by individuals who collect and maintain high IQ functional sections of civilization amids a morass of general decline. Likely to be corporate and feudal in nature, though possibly not as dystopian as that sounds because they may have some of the possitive elements of historical feudalism, such as continuity and protectionism.
Keep your powder dry: Do not act where no opportunity for improvement exists. Allow other players to expend resources while you wait, as long as there are any reasonable possibilities of improved conditions in the future.
Integrate into positions of power that can be leveraged at later points in time. Particularly where recruiting a bringing on more likeminded individuals can be be achieved.
Things to avoid:
Becoming a culture-drone with downloaded opinions.
Becoming an Andeman Islander: A sideshow holdout left behind by history
Becoming an impoverished underclass favella inhabitant.